Did Freud Accept Or Reject Mysticism?

In "New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis",liars.
Freud discusses his views on mysticism andHowever, despite denouncing mysticism at the
psychoanalysis. The concept of mysticism hasbeginning of the lecture, Freud decides to discuss
changed throughout the ages. In ancient times, amysticism as if it were scientific material. During the
mystic was one who communed with God. In Freud'slecture, he informs the audience that he will elevate the
world, the word mysticism became an all-inclusivesubject of mysticism to the level of scientific inquiry. He
word describing paranormal phenomenon occurringis fully aware that he is going against the tide of
outside the laws of nature and science. Scienceintellectual, psychological and historical factors. He
tended to dismiss or ignore mystical ideas becausechanges his tone, and argues that any scientific theory
they were viewed as superstitious, irrational andmust be reasonable in accordance with the laws of
nonsensical. Freud associated the word mysticism withnature. He cites an example of the Earth's center
séances, voices from other worlds, noises,being filled with heavy metals instead of jam as a
apparitions, levitation, trances and prophecies (Coward,reasonable assumption. He says a mystical hypothesis
1977, p. 1). Freud also had a reputation of being hostilemight claim there is 'jam at the center of the Earth',
to mysticism and was opposed to integrating mysticalthus lending itself to immediate rejection. However,
ideas into psychoanalysis. His friendship with Carl JungFreud points out that the immediate rejection of any
ended due to Jung's beliefs in spiritual and mysticaltheory can be "erroneous and detrimental". He
concepts (Wagner, 2008).remembers the negative reaction he received from
At the beginning of the lecture, Freud offers anthe medical community when he wrote about the
unflattering view of mysticism and speaksexistence of 'the unconscious'. Freud says he
condescendingly toward the subject by refusing toencountered the same type of condemnation that
offer any specific definition for the the word itself. Hemystics have experienced throughout the ages.
says, "You must not expect me to make any attemptConsequently, he cautions his audience not to reject a
at embracing this ill-circumscribed region withhypothesis based solely on intellectual considerations.
definitions". Freud says "we all know about this otherSurprisingly, at the end of the lecture, Freud questions
world" of mysticism which exists beyond the provenhis own skepticism toward mysticism, "If one regards
laws of science. Subsequently, he discusses mysticismoneself as a skeptic, it is a good plan to have
as if the audience is skeptical toward the subject.occasional doubts about one's skepticism too. It may
From a psychological perspective, Freud is arguing thatbe that I too have a secret inclination towards the
mankind tends to believe in miracles and themiraculous which thus goes halfway to meet the
paranormal. He says people become bored with reality,creation of occult facts." (Freud, 1965, p. 53) Going
and 'reason' is not exciting enough for them to find"halfway" toward accepting occult "facts" represents
pleasure in. He claims that people embrace thea major shift in Freud's thinking. He is no longer
intriguing nature of mysticism because it addsrejecting the concept of mysticism, and is admitting
excitement to their mundane lives. Freudbeing intuitively drawn to its unscientific explanations.
acknowledges mankind's fascination with the unseenHowever, he does not embrace mysticism by any
and the miraculous, but claims that 'reason and science'means, but is fascinated by the possibilities of the
are mankind's greatest strengths.unknown and the unseen. Therefore, Freud is not
Historically, Freud says mysticism offers nothing newviewing mysticism with utter skepticism, and is
for mankind. He argues that mysticism helps religionsexpressing his curiosity about 'other worldly' mysteries
ward off the advancement of science, and saysthat science may never be able to explain.
religious reports of prophecies, apparitions and miraclesWorks Cited
are imaginative fables filled with nonsense, fraud andCoward, H. G. (1977). Mystics and scholars: The
ignorance. However, Freud admits there is no way tocalgary conference on mysticism,1976. Waterloo:
prove or disprove these assertions, and whateverWilfred Laurier University Press.
occurred in ancient times cannot be tested or validatedFreud, S. (1965). New introductory lectures on
today. He claims that those who follow mysticalpsychoanalysis. (J. Strachey, Trans.) New York: W.W.
teachings are charlatans, quacks, mind-readers andNorton & Company.